Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 144 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2012 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. / UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' PROTECTIVE MOTION FOR REMEDIES The United States, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to the Petitioners' Protective Motionfor Remedies. In their Protective Motion for Remedies, Petitioners "ask[] the Court to award all the[ remedies that they outline in their responses to the [government's) motion to dismiss." DE 128 at 1-2. Petitioners further contend that "[t]he Court should award all of these remedies to the victims for the reasons explained in their pleadings and because these remedies address the Government's violation of their rights." Id. at 2. As a threshold matter, Petitioners' Protective Motion for Remedies should be denied because no such motion is cognizable under the Crime Victims Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, or under any rules of Court, and because the motion fails to "incorporate a memorandum of law citing supporting authorities," as required by Rule 7.1(a)(1) of the Local Rules. S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(a)(1). Indeed, although Petitioners refer to their "response to the Government's motion to dismiss and sealed response to the Government's motion to dismiss," DE 128 at 1, neither of those filings contains citation to authority that even purports to furnish specific support for any 1 EFTA02753740