Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/14/2011 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S OMNIBUS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION We clarify at the outset the plaintiffs' claim that they have the plea negotiation letters and therefore the letters cannot be privileged. [DE 96 at 13-14]. We have cleared this up before, with the plaintiffs' lawyers acknowledging their mistake, [DE 80 at 1], but for some reason the plaintiffs insist on making the same misleading claims again. The plaintiffs do not have the letters or emails written by the defense attorneys to the government. The plaintiffs only have the letters from the government to the defense attorneys, pursuant to orders issued by Magistrate Judge that addressed the plaintiffs' request "for documents the federal government gave to Epstein in the course of its plea discussions with him" and "documents ... given by the government to Epstein ...." [DE 462 at 7, 10] (emphasis in original); see also [Order, DE 513 at 2] (ruling on "documents the government itself gave Epstein"). This pleading replies to the responses filed by the government [DE 98] and by the plaintiffs [DE 96] in response to Mr. Epstein's motion for limited intervention. Mr. Epstein's intervention is timely, as of right and as a matter of discretion, and properly limited to the legal issues concerning EFTA02753594