Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 106 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marraa JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES / JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to respond in opposition to the supplemental briefing of defense attorneys Roy Black, Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz to intervene in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a) (DE 94) ("supplemental briefing"). The victims continue to oppose the defense attorneys' motion to intervene in this civil CVRA enforcement action (DE 56) for all the reasons that they have articulated in their previous opposition (DE 78). Yet even though the defense attorneys have not been permitted to intervene, they have proceeded to brief the merits of arguments that they would present if the Court were to grant intervention, including most recently new "supplemental" briefing on the discoverability of plea negotiation correspondence. While the victims continue to believe that their arguments against the defense attorneys intervening are meritorious, out of an abundance of caution and to expedite this case, the victims now respond to the defense attorneys' new claims on the merits. 1 EFTA02753567