Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 61 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 — MARRA/ JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ro PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IDE 601 Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff JANE DOE ll's First Amended Complaint: 1. Defendant admits that Plaintiff has sued Defendant in this action. Defendant denies the remainder of the allegations. 2. Deny. 3. As to the allegations in paragraph 3, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 EFTA02750715