Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 49 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/22/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 09-80469-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE H, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT AND REQUIRING TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 3, 2009 THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant a") ("Defendant" or Motion to Set Aside Order of Default (DE 42), filed June 23, 2009. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has reviewed the motion, response, reply, and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. On June 17, 2009, the Court entered an Order of Default Against Defendant (DE 39). In that Order, the Court stated that it "has reviewed the affidavit of service accompanying Plaintiff's motion for default against service on Defendant and concludes that Plaintiff effected in a manner authorized by New York state law." See DE 39 citing N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 308(4). The Court concluded that, because Defendant failed to timely answer the complaint or otherwise respond thereto, Plaintiff was entitled to an Order of Default 1 EFTA02750664