Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 — MARRS JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS & SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to exceed the page limitation of 20 pages imposed by Loc. Gen. Rule 7.1. C. 2. (S.D. Fla.), in his memorandum of law in support of his motion to dismiss directed to Plaintiff JANE DOE II's Complaint [DE 1], filed March 25, 2009. In support of his motion, Defendant states: 1. Local Gen. Rule 7.1 C. 2. provides in part that absent prior permission of the court, no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding 20 pages in length. Defendant is in the process of preparing his motion to dismiss and supporting memorandum of law directed to Plaintiffs Complaint, (which is due by an extension to May 6, 2009), and the legal memorandum will exceed the 20 page limitation. It is clear based on the issues raised in Plaintiff's Complaint that in excess of 20 pages is required to fully and adequately discuss the issues raised in moving to dismiss Plaintiffs action. 2. The issues being addressed include but are not limited to constitutional law issues and what version of 18 U.S.C.A. §2255 applies to this action, and the meaning of §2255 with respect to the cause of action created and the presumptive minimum EFTA02750339