Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 524 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2010 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRia Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S UNTIMELY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REDACTED VERSIONS OF FIFTH AMENDMENT ARGUMENTS Plaintiff, Jane Doe, respectfully files this response to defendant Jeffrey Epstein's untimely Motion for Leave to File Redacted Versions of Sensitive Fifth Amendment Arguments and Submit Un-Redacted Arguments to the Court (dkt. #518). While the motion is not completely clear, Epstein seems to be arguing that he can file these arguments with regard to his appeal of the magistrate judge's ruling in favor of Jane Doe on various discovery issues (dkt. #462). This particular appeal, however, is already fully briefed — as the appeal/request for Rule 4 review (dkt. #477), Jane Doe's response (dkt. #485), and Epstein's reply (dkt. #502) were all filed well before Epstein's motion to submit new redacted arguments. Epstein's motion does not contend that any of these issues are newly discovered or otherwise arose recently. Therefore, at least with EFTA02749081