Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 41-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/07/2009 Page f 0 x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRAMMI JANE DOE NO. 6, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. T INTERROGATORIES PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRS ed counsel, and pursuant to Plaintiff, JANE DOE 6, by and through her undersign nds to Defendant, JEFFREY Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby respo s: EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follow General Objections 1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information the extent that the protected by the attorney-client cable privilege or immunity, privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other appli whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and ry, and excludes privileged and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogato ndant's discovery. Any disclosure is protected information from any responses to Defe eges or protections, which are inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privil specifically reserved. 2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly extent that same are broad. At' EFTA02742844