Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 24-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 703 So.2d 1076 703 Sold 1076.22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169 (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. Kimberly BALAS and Teresa Shumate, Petitioners, v. Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Respondents. No. 97-82. Alp 14% Page I 307Ak3I k. Relevancy and Materiality. Most Cited Cases Party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)( I). [3] Pretrial Procedure 3O7A 0=36.1 Oct. 10, 1997. 307A Pretrial Procedure As Modified on Grant of Clarification Jan. 2, 1998. ,.. 307A11 Depositions and Discovery re'y elet-‘‘ 14/ na • 307A11(A) Discovery in General Plaintiffs brought action against alleged house of \ten). 3O7Ak36 Particular Subjects of Disclos- ure prostitution for, inter alia, coercion ofoostitution. 307Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited The Circuit Court, Brevard County, Pound, Cases J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel disEvidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certiorrevenues relating to such activities, including activari. The District Court of Appeal. W. Sharp, J., held ities with alleged house of prostitution against that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and which they had filed suit, was discoverable, where their revenues relating to such activities was displaintiffs brought action not only for coercion of coverable. prostitution, but also for battery, false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of Petition denied. emotional distress, violation of their civil rights, Harris, J., concurred specially and filed opinion. and racketeering. Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, § 40302, 42 U.S.C.A. § West Headnotes 13981; West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)( I). and Heather Fis