From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 2:41 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: TV OLED? On Mar 13, 2017, at 10:20 AM, =effrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: New =led On =on, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:37 AM Kathy Ruemmle wrote: Advice on what type of tv =o buy for my bedroom (in DC)? I don't know the difference between =ed, 4D, blah blah. Per below from my contractor, it is supposed =o be thin. Also prefer one that comes without the CIA/NSA =ption.... Sent from my =Pad Begin =orwarded message: From: Jim Hindley Date: March 13, 2017 at 8:27:33 AM EDT To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: TV Hi =athy, I can =ork around that for a couple of days. I realize the choice of available =v options is off the charts. Building a niche for a tv, automatically =estricts you to future size upgrades. However, one dimension that (in =our exhaustive search) should be dialed in ,is the thickness. =urrently, readily available televisions are available in a LED,LCD,and =lasma format. I'm no techie, I.e. I deal with the application of math, =hemistry, physics, history, and reading comprehension, on a daily =asis. Semi-conductors are outside of my knowledge base. Once all those =ittle bytes have been neatly packaged, game on. See if you can narrow your =earch to present me with the overall thickness of the television. Gabby =as specified that the existing wall will be padded approximately 2", =nd many LED type televisions fall within that dimension. If, however, =ou opt to go with a thicker tv, we may need to forego the articulating =rm, and simply bolt the thing to the wall (So that it doesn't project =eyond wall plane) Sorry for the long-winded explanation, but I thought =t wise to give you some parameters. Thanks, Jim EFTA_R1_01904031 EFTA02657731