From: Michael Wolff < Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2018 3:49 PM To: Subject: Re: > At this point I don't think you can go legal=stic. They've won the high ground—young, vulnerable, poor =irls. On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 a= 10:44 AM J <jeevacation@gmail=com <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: do you thi=k we highlight , that at the end of the day it was prositution=. sex for money. . a state crime. with=state laws. On S=t, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:18 AM Michael Wolff < » wrote: don't tweet this <=iv class="gmail_quote"> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:13 AM J <[email protected]</=» wrote: On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 9:09 AM Michael Wolff = <mailto > wrote: This thing as model journalism is one more element that could give it le=s--so another danger. I don't think it's a question now of directl= debunking this. That's going against virtue itself. What I'd like=to do is game out everything, creating a structure for thinking this throu=h. Definitely not a piecemeal response. Figure out where we want to be and=where we can reasonably get and work backwards. Maybe we do agree to a big=interview with you--Landon Thomas or something like that. But this has to =e war gamed out. Obviously I can contribute, Kathy can, would be great to =et SB input, but this needs a structure, that's why I think Hiltzig or=somebody assembling a plan would be helpful. Even if in the end you decide=to do nothing, at least you've come up with a structured way to think =bout it. On Sat, Dec 1, 201= at 8:57 AM J <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: kathy thought the piece is being lauded as great investigat=ve journalism so does your suggested pr group have the b=tter contacts to place a story. on why it is not. .40=A0 howeer to you point. to what end? EFTA_R1_01805824 EFTA02610803