From: Lawrence Krauss Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 9:16 PM To: Jeffrey E. Cc: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: Hello--CONFIDENTIAL I =gree with you regarding compromise. This is an appeal letter to =he president. It is to explain to him with the proposed disciplinary =ction is not warranted. Letters that were not solicited by the =EI but should have been seem fair game in this regard. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics =epartment Arizona State University, P.O. Box =71404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 twitter.comilkraussl I www.lawrencemkrauss.com <http://ww.lawrencemkrauss.com> On Aug 22, 2018, at 2:13 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: is there any -precedent in an appeal letter to add letters of =upport? i think it is a legal appeal not an appeal to =nes emotions . it is legal grounds or =ot. you can attack the credibility of witnesses but =ou have been found to be not credible. and with a multi =ear behavior issue however did you break a =ule??? I dont think you should suggest a =ompromise in an appeal letter. . you can make refernce to not =anting a long drawn out court battle. a bit =hreatening, but not play your hand On Wed, =ug 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Lawrence Krauss wrote: This is highly confidential of course, but it is good news, =nd I will use it in the appeal doc, which I am HEAVILY revising =oday. I am also going to send you another support letter that is suite important in a minute. Lawrence M. =rauss Professor School of Earth & Space =xploration and Physics Department Arizona State =niversity, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 EFTA_R1_01796404 EFTA02605750