From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2018 3:05 PM To: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: Professor Krauss' Letter the only thing that matters there is what did or does lucy=say?? my lawyer thinks the discrimination suit has=legs. he said your case is a loser on the facts.=C2* you did do it. everyone says you did it. his=view after he stopped laughting at my idea said , yes , =ont make it about what he did, make it about why? =C24e not sure if i agree but its quite amusing. H= also thought that your admissions were ill advised. to put it mildl= On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Lawrence Krauss wrote: Ha. Interesting. They only spoke to pen, who=wasn't her supervisor. Lawrence M. Krauss Sent from my iPhone <=div> On Aug 11, 2018, at 4:21 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wro=e: I re read =his, . it said lucy told her supervisor .=C240. ? so did they speak to lucy or only the su • ervisor. > =AO . I have an out of the box thought. . The=list of behavior that goes back years. is illustrative of a not a redator or a danger. =C24 In, wondering whether we can suggest and document as is obvious to all it is a benefi= and a burden. To dismiss ou would be Only when controncte= with a public gossip articel did they take action. . crime. under title 9 , half of t=e great scientists would be out of work. On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:06 PM, L=wrence Krauss I MM> wrote: I am being terminated. We need to app=al. Lawrence M. Krauss is a EFTA_R1_01793095 EFTA02603716