From: Vincenzo lozzo Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 1:27 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: privacy&other requirements Jeffrey, not sure if you and Joi spoke yesterday about the food stamps thing at =11 and whether we want to move forward with this. If so, we need two things: 1) We need to understand what balance of privacy vs transparency the =ovt expects. We can tweak crypto enough to achieve almost any level of =hat combination, but we need to know what they'd like to have first. For instance: do they want the transaction amounts to be public? What =bout the type of transaction? etc etc 2) The level of cooperation we can expect: are we getting money from =hem? are they talking/enforcing things to merchants? What's the =imeframe they have in mind? and a bunch of other things One side-note here is that we need to think about 'competition', meaning =hat even if we keep it quiet visa/mastercard/amex will figure out what =e are doing and then it's a matter of making sure that they don't =vertake us. Anyhow, let's try to figure out if we want to do this and then maybe it =akes sense to talk all together to the govt people? Vincenzo <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>conversation-idgkey> <integer>29973S</integer> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1408886828</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> <array> <integer>6</integer> <integer>2</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>433956</string> </diet> EFTA_R1_01768247 EFTA02587532