From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 5:22 PM To: Thomas Turrin; Melanie Spinella Subject: Fwd: FW: N624N: Part 135 Certification i psecifically asked this question at our face to face.&nb=p; please if you are not sure about something in the fut=re just tell me, it makes me crazy to get bad info Forwarded message From: Richard Joslin &l=;[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]»=br>Date: Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:37 PM Subject: FW: N624N: Part 135 Ce=tification To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <[email protected]», Eileen Alexanderson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Plane update=/u> </=pan> From: Mandel, Michael Imailto:[email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:36 AM To: '[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ' Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] <mailto:William_Beversluis@jet=viation.com> ; Joh= Hannan; Richard Joslin; Thomas Turrin ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]=m> ) Subject: N624N: Part 135 Certification < = > Don, to say I am at a =oss to understand why, more than seven months after this process began, th=s aircraft is still not on Jet's Part 135 certificate is the understatement of the day. Jet has provided us a myriad of reaso=s, starting with other planes in the queue ahead of this one, to the gover=ment shutdown, to the loss of personnel in the office of the TEB FSDO, to =he holidays, but all I know is that during this same period we have managed to get other aircraft Part 135 cer=ified in 6 — 8 weeks. </=pan> Most recently, the rep=rts from Jet personnel have been that the aircraft would be on Jet's=certificate by the 10th of January, then by the end of January, then by the middle of February and most recently by Feb. 24 (t=is last date allegedly coming directly from you). And here we are on=Feb. 27 in no different a position than we we