From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 10:33 AM To: Stephen Hanson Subject: Re: example and only one of many understood.. Im in meetings =his morning until 1. . - steve the person who put=this your numbers together should be fired they are not , an a=countant . it is awful. . it contributes to the is=ue. . I told you day one , that I thought this was a bad deal.=C2 david asked you to do the restaurant. . you =aid you didnt want to be his bitch and have him make money off of your bac=. . you and i discussed it at length. I thought it a bad=idea , but you wanted to be in your words 50/50 wi=h david. I told you that that is a marriage and i thought unwi=e. . you agiain put your foot on the gas, and wanted in =s a full participant. you bought the trade. =C2 the first PG was already crazy, . i never ever eve= ever would have suggested a pg EVER. ! under any circumstance= . the second was more of the same but already pregant.=C2 . the numbers are all over the pl=ce. read the sheet you sent . past present f=ture. all on the same line. you have been consissn=t in saying if we jjust had enough money to open . that has been sin=e march. . On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Stephen Hanson wrote: mailto: You should realize david lies about everything </=iv> First <=iv id="m_-5498418142335357171AppleMailSignature">l needed 800 k we had m=de a earlier budget months ago that showed - if we opened months ago -I co=ld have made it with 750k - david kept using this budget - I let it go =A0 What david did not share =ith you is that because of such a late opening - I have given him an addit=onal budget -of a loss of 175k to get us to march - tmi - but opening so l=te gives you zero momentum into first 3 months of 2018 This has still not ben addressed =A0 Because david has told ev=ryone months ago we would have the needed funding - we where told to start=to ramp up - which increased payroll - I put the brakes on. From addit