From: Noam Chomsky < Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 10:43 PM To: jeffrey E.; Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: If I write him, I'm sure he'll say that he is reti=ent for the reasons he and Deborah have both outlined: his responsibilitie= as a trustee under the law. And I'm sure he'll=say that he is acting on his own, as trustee, without consultation with th= children. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:40 PM, jeffre= E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: yes, but I think first you should ask=max , why he is reticent. and has he heard from the children. ?Q=A0 gather all the facts first <=iv class="e> =n Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Noam Chomsky < =; wrote: Valeria=forwarded this to me. As I already wrote, the idea that the children=would be thinking of suing him seems to me utterly outlandish, and if ther= is the slightest hint of any such thing, I will react instantly and decis=vely. If Max has any such concern, he can simply resign=as trustee and do nothing. No one can sue him for telling his client= that he's not representing them any longer. He then does not ag=ee to distribute the funds and is completely free from the threat of any s=it. My own feeling is what I wrote a little while=ago. Ask Deborah to draft a letter, and go on from there. 40=ACI Does that seem OK to you? On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:=0 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailtoleevacation@gmail=com» wrote: Forwarded messa=e From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]=» Date: Fri, Oct 27, 20=7 at 3:25 PM Subject: Re: trust To: Valeria Chomsky < re indemnity EFTA_R1_01745122 EFTA02574375