From: Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 1:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Hello Personal/Political bias is =ne thing (I still would exploit it any and every time on cross); this was =n obsession and directly relevant "Stop Trump." Also, the IG made cl=ar in his testimony Strzok told him McCabe was there. McCabe is anot=er real character. He denies this; but he also is irreconcilably at =dds with Comey on WSJ leak. Absolutely right that taking emails alon= is not fair; but I would point out that it is folks like Strzok and compa=y who have ruined many a businesman's life based exclusively on a twisted =eading of emails sold to a jury. Flynn is an interesting case. =1 believe I could have gotten his plea back for him in a second based on w=at has surfaced; but he decided to go a different way. But as to you= underlying point that there might well be something to go after with thes= guys, I hear you; but I have spent my whole career fighting bullies and c=ooked, unethical prosecutors. That will remain a guiding principle f=r me, whether the target is popular, hated, a complete jerk, guilty, etc.&=bsp; I am doing ok, thanks. I see you really follow this stuff. = -riginal Message From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@ mail.com> To: David Schoen < Sent: Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:51 am Subject: Re: Hello we're on the same team. strzok. testimon= was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not =ndicative of non professionalism. I believe he sai= nothing more than it referenced " andys office". . paig= says andy was there. how many other people were there ? =were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other .&nbs=; was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails a=one is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to s=y that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with s=epticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had man= neg hillary opinions .. - michael cohen. michael flyn=. . are not fictions