From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 11:56 PM To: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: Letter no, i want her to understd that she bears great res=onsibility for what has happend, she wants to talk to me=toorw. . the letter was disgusting On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at =:27 PM, Valeria Chomsky < >=wrote: Regarding your s=ggestion to ask D's advice about how to respond the letter from N'= children, from yesterday, January 8th, we have reached to D's advice =reviously, but her reply was, somehow, reinforcing the children's and =ax's positions and I had to correct her in many points, as you can see=below. So, we don't think it is worth. Although, I agree t=at, as our lawyer, D would have the obligation to do something about it, e=pecially about all the serious insinuations and accusations that are impli=it and some explicit in the children's letter. I can't under=tand this. It seems they want to prepare the ground, creating their =wn reality by ignoring over and over the facts that Noam has presented rep=atedly in his several letters to them about how the money was being used.=C2 They seem to want to manipulate information according to their own i=terests and repeat it until it becomes convincing to anyone who reads their explanation -- that for someone who is not aware of all the details, it s=unds very reasonable. All very difficult and exhausting. Valeria =/div> Forwarded message F=om: Valeria Chomsk Date: Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:09 PM Sub=ect: Clarifications To: Deborah Pechet Quina Cc: Noam Chomsk Deborah, <mailto Gene Landy », Valeria Chomsky I would like to have things even cle=rer and I think the nomenclature we use is extremely important to establis= the truth of the facts and not give false ideas and illusions to anyone, =ncluding ourselves (Noam and me) in our communication. So I would like if =ou could review the files and let us know about these issues. First, I think we need to refer to the IRA accou