From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 12:45 PM To: David Schoen Subject: Re: Hello we're on the same team. M. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include emb=llishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. =C2 I believe he said nothing more than it referenced " andys offic=". . says andy was there. how man= other people were there ? were and-. off in the c=rner talking to each other . was mccabe on the phone? =AO you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . =AO isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opin=ons . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have b=as. . had many neg hillary opinions . . - =michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictions created by mu=ller ? how are you On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM, <=pan direltr"><Gotti was an anomaly beca=se of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I ge= your point. Couple of things: <mailto 1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as =ood as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorist= on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of po=itical bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not=alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. =e don't yet know what his private emails showed. =, however= says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his orfice discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That =ust cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence of personal or=other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it =s an open invitation for cross examination and any other exploitation poss=ble as it cannot be an accepted part of the process. 2. In this whole matter, I am most disturbed by the composition =f the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to learn anything fro= the IG's report it is the importance of having an inve