From: President < Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 1:49 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: So you are partly wrong. You stayed only for part. And too tell you the tru=h for many on the stage it did exactly what you say. In the audience it ca= never be a mass you change in 2000 people with classical music, but a min=rity of individuals. And there were many who would disagree. But I do not dispute that the connection to the audience should have been d=fferent---and the ideal circumstance would have permitted some props and c=stumes and super titles. It si an opera after all. So get the point, but the analogy does not quite fit. You have some point--=ince that is what you saw and felt and I can't dispute that. But there wer= others--and not friends--for whom the performance did something important= The difference is that not enough and the audience needs to be different.=You know who came up to me in droves afterwards to say that it was the hig= point of their lives--the girls in the children's chorus--who were blown =way by the beauty of the music and the story and the quality of what happe=ed. Original Message From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> To: "President" < Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 8:39:18 AM Subject: Re: In the 60s in hyde park there was speakers corner, when someone thought the= had something important to say and truly blieved they were on the right s=de of history god. the argument, they got on a box , did their thing , and=some in the crowd, appluded, slept. walked away, are were inspired to get =n a box next weekend. I personally think the performance needs to change t=e lives ,thinkning of some in the crowd. new insights, new illumination. ,=forever changed. at least for a week or so. yesterdays, performnace , had =o redeening quality, none. it was joke telling in a foreign language. wher= the teller found it hysterical and his audience just stared blankly, even=a bakers hat. key on the mayor. a smile on t