From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 6:18 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: Noam Chomsky i think you should ok her sending but admonish her f=r being unwilling to ask tough questions that just resulted in a pay=ent to you of 267k. she said she had a confl=ct. NONSENSE> . On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 6:5= PM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: Is it OK for me to tell Deborah to=proceed with this? ----- =---- Forwarded message From: D=borah Pechet Quinan <c 3. Date: Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at =2:05 PM Subject: Fwd: Noam Chomsky To: Noam Chomsky v= Dear Noam, In response to your recent request my paralegal, Jayne Mahoney, has re=iewed the records you sent us and the records in our possession and i have=reviewed her findings. With the materials we have available we are not abl= to reconcile the numbers. Therefore I suggest that I send the email below to Sam Bain to see if we can get to =he bottom of this. Please let me know if you approve of this email. Thanks, Deborah S=nt from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity and typos. Dear Sam, Noam has requested that we look into a discrepancy o= his behalf regarding a RMD distribution made on January 22, 2015 in the a=ount of $187,000. He states that he has been unable to determi=e where these funds went. In your records, it shows this distribution was made to the Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust an= then subsequently wired to his checking account. Noam states that a=deposit was made into his checking account on that date in the amount of $=0,000, but not the full amount. We can also see from your records that distributions totalling $150,000 were =ade from the Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust during the period of January 26,=015 — February 4, 2015, which may account for some of these funds,=but not the total, and none of these distributions show a wire/deposit into the checking account. We are unable to go a=y further in our investigation as we have no other records to check. EFTA_R1_01639973