From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 10:46 PM To: Farkas, Andrew L. Subject: Re: can you call me On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Fark=s, Andrew L. < > > wrote: 500-750 is fine for now. We will settle on allocations in the next wee= or so as we move to our final bids, thru due dil, and develop our propose= structure. And then there will be the c-Ill side (on ehich I understand L=on to now be working wth Lazard). When do you get to NYC? Sent from my iPad On Apr 19, 2015, at 5:53 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com» wrote: understood, will get it for you, h=w much woudl you like it to be for.? 500. 800 . ?? On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Farkas, Andrew =. > wrote: If that is unclear, let me know and i'll call you. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Farkas, Andrew L. Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:38 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I need someone to tell me how much they would invest assuming the due dilig=nce proves out, etc. It's not a commitment, much more a statement of i=tent and preparedness to back us if we decide to proceed and they themselv=s are satisfied with the overall transaction once it solidifies. Morgan Stanley will call them and ask it they are prep=red to back us to the tune of whatever their number is, again assuming the=due dil proves out etc. Morgan Stanley will also need to satisfy themselve= that each investor has the wherewithal to write their portion of the check should they elect to do so. So all I r=ally need is an email saying that assuming everyone is satisfied with the =esults of the due dil and the structure, they would be prepared to invest =x. Totally non-binding. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. From: Jeffrey E. Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 3:19 PM To: Farkas, Andrew L. EFTA_R1_01634192 EFTA02504725