From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:59 AM To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: i believe the terms . I will check but the npa is public. =equiring me to pay for their attorneys and not contest liability,4,=A0 in the govt response in the cvra case they i believe refernced the fact=that she benefited from the very agreement that she now after taking the m=ney attacks.. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Kathy Ruemmler > wrote: Are you req'd to keep the fact and terms of =he settlement with her confidential? Sent from my iPad On Apr 22, 2015, at 3:48 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com» wrote: <=div> should we state =hat the gov't oobligated him to pay vr a sum of money. wihtout him being allowed to test her claims in court. s=e took full advantage of that agreement. and it is this very same agremment=20 that she now attempts to overturn. t please note =he information contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is in=ended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEEUnauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any p=rt thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have rece=ved this communication in error, please notify us immediately by ret=rn e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <[email protected]> , and destroy this communication an= all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights r=served =C24), please note EFTA_R1_01634016 EFTA02504578