From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 4:44 PM To: Mike Sitrick Inbox <=iv class="" style> <https://ssIgstatic.com/ui/v1ficons/mail/profile_maskix.pn=> <=div> Darren Indyke 11:33 AM (56 minutes ago) <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/images/cleard=t.gif> to me <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/images/cleardot.g.f> Please see below a prop=sed draft letter from you to Michael. Settlement Discussions Michael, Thanks for your time yesterday . to hopefully w=rk towards a resolution to put this matter in the past I thoug=t it would be helpful to at least agree on the facts. so if not too much t=oublethere are a few points that I would like to understand 1. You told me that you won the arbitration, ? I unders=ood that after your lawyers sent an arbitration demand in March 2012, in J=ne 2012 my lawyers challenged it, sending to the AAA a letter demonstrating that the 2005 agreement with Roy Black's firm which you said was t=e source of the agreement to arbitrate was no longer in effect. In response, your lawyers initially sought to stay the arbitration, threatening to file a complaint in LA County court, When they could not see eye to eye on a settlement, yours filed a complaint=20 confidentiality obligations, which was never served on me, and obtained what everyone understands to be a curr=ntly unenforceable default judgment. So, as i now understand it your bills were never reviewed by any cou=t or arbitrator. 2. You told me yesterday that you received a paym=nt from me. Would you please send me the details of that payment. In=additoin you said you would provide me the sum of what roy had paid =ou. in 05.7 3. oddly Your email did not agree with the e=ail that my lawyers received only on April 3 from your lawyer, lance Shinder, who advised that according to your own records, you suggested you were owed $204,393.67, and Lance off=red to accept $150,000. 4. If you were operating under the 2005 Agreement =wer