From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 11:43 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Off now From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 4:30 PM To: Mike Sitrick Subject: Re: Follow up can you speak now?. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Mike Sitrick <mailto: » wrote: Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your information is incorrect. Although I think it is unproductive at this late stage to re-harsh what has transpired, I will since you reached out to me and indicated your desire to resolve this. 1. My counsel reached out to your counsel in July of 2012 and indicated their preference to litigate this matter in the confidential confines of Arbitration, pursuant to our engagement letter. Among other things, we felt this would be advantageous to you given the sensitive nature of our engagement. We informed your counsel that if you would not arbitrate that we would file an action in Los Angeles Superior Court, and sent your counsel a courtesy copy of the complaint. My counsel repeatedly reiterated to your counsel our desire to amicably resolve this dispute. In late 2013 when the debt was much less (before more in attorneys fees, costs and interest was incurred) your side made a bad faith offer of $25,000 on a debt of that was over $103,000. 2. A complaint was then filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in 2013. We obtained a default judgment, awarding 100% of the professional fees, interest on those fees and out of pocket expenses from your engagement of our firm, including $20,000 of attorneys' fees. The award was consistent with and validated the terms in our engagement letter. EFTA_R1_01632844 EFTA02503826