From: Mike Sitrick Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:22 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: RE: Follow up Jeffrey I have had some time to check the facts. Your information is incorrect. Although I think it is unproductive at this late stage to re•harsh what has transpired, I will since you reached out to me and indicated your desire to resolve this. 1. My counsel reached out to your counsel in July of 2012 and indicated their preference to litigate this matter in the confidential confines of Arbitration, pursuant to our engagement letter. Among other things, we felt this would be advantageous to you given the sensitive nature of our engagement. We informed your counsel that if you would not arbitrate that we would file an action in Los Angeles Superior Court, and sent your counsel a courtesy copy of the complaint. My counsel repeatedly reiterated to your counsel our desire to amicably resolve this dispute. In late 2013 when the debt was much less (before more in attorneys fees, costs and interest was incurred) your side made a bad faith offer of $25,000 on a debt of that was over $103,000. 2. A complaint was then filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in 2013. We obtained a default judgment, awarding 100% of the professional fees, interest on those fees and out of pocket expenses from your engagement of our firm, including $20,000 of attorneys' fees. The award was consistent with and validated the terms in our engagement letter. 3. It is undisputed that (i) at your request, we were retained; (ii) I personally immediately began to engage and assigned senior staff members to work with me given the sensitivity of the matter and the onslaught of media inquiries and attention; (iii) we sent invoices to Darren and others without objection; (iiii) we continued to work and (v) the invoices were never paid. As a result, I incurred additional attorney's fees and costs. My attorneys advise me that the current judgment is enforceable. The original complaint was