From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2015 7:59 PM To: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: October that would not account for the power laws On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at =:25 PM, Lawrence Krauss wrote: <=lockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:lpx=ficcc solid;padding-left:lex"> the most =robable distribution is a uniform one.. that is the reason that the =ir in the room you are breathing in has uniform density throughout (to fir=t approx). The entropy is greatest when things are spread out unifor=ly.. That is precisely the opposite of what gravity does. </=iv> <=iv style="word-wrap:break-word"> Lawrence M. Krauss<=span> Director, The Origins Project at ASU Co-Dir=ctor, Cosmology Initiative Foundation Professor ./b> School of Earth & Space Expl • = izona =tate University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 8=287-1404 R=search Office: , Assistant (Jessica): Ori ins Office C nthia =iv> <=div> On Sep 20, 2015, at 5:51 AM, jeffre= E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: agreed, =C2 help me through this . why is not gravity merely t=e pseudo force that is a consequence of both he law of large numbers and t=e central limit theorem. . the distribution of mass assu=ing the universe is effectively infinite. forces particles together to kee= the distribution the most probable . Einsteins idea that grav=ty is merely an aspect of mass. or a curvature of space time. is not=as elegant as it simply is the result of the most likely probabilistic sta=e of particles. in the lyapunov central limit =AO, taken over all space suggests to me that what physicists have seen as=a curve is only the result of of most likely state. -- I can f=nd no satisfying derivation of the power laws. including newtonian gravity= general and special relativity give measurement but not=cause. <=iv class="gmail quote">On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Lawrence Krauss =span dir="ltr> wrote: EFTA_R1_01604545 EF