From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 6:09 PM To: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: Allegations desires at home, not relevant. any longer 4>=A0 they were the same desires that prompted a twiitter respoinseQ=A0 that was predictably met by more accustaions On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:20 PM, La=rence Krauss > wrote: Thanks for the call this morning.. I emailed Erin along the =ines we discussed.. Thanks for that. I still have not decided upon J=stin as an advisor, and I appreciated your thoughts on this, which as you =now I have to balance against desires at home. I do appreciate your =ffer of the $25K if necessary. On Apr 3, 2018, at 9:42 AM, jeffrey E. [email protected]» wrote: ok, did you meet with the ugly wom=n attny ? your quesitons will be public. so make t=em self serving and polite. dont tell her what she should do=C24> only ask respectfully and somewaht shocked . after years=of i am now told for the very first time that. =C24> were these ever made at the time ? 1>=A0 etc =n Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Lawrence Krauss rote: Justin is not ideal, but given t=e current situation I believe it is necessary to have someone advising me =ith more knowledge of rights and procedures. THey seem to flying by the se=t of their pants here, and will need to establish what is proper... While = am sure he would like to be at the first meeting, I don't want th=t, but I think he could prepare me better for that meeting. I am goi=g to email her with some more questions indeed.. will be peppering h=r with questions both before and during and after the meeting.. More later. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:01 AM= Lawrence Krauss <mailto > wrote: Well, this came in today, and this clarifies some things.= Particulary it is clear that this office is not really following any proc=dure and isn't out to deal with me in a way that respects my=rights. (no surprise to you!). Statements like "include, but=not limited to"? What the fuc