From: Lawrence Krauss Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 2:40 PM To: jeffrey E. Cc: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: Allegations Justin is not ideal, but given the current situation I =elieve it is necessary to have someone advising me with more knowledge =f rights and procedures. THey seem to flying by the seat of their pants =ere, and will need to establish what is proper... While I am sure he =ould like to be at the first meeting, I don't want that, but I =hink he could prepare me better for that meeting. I am going to =mail her with some more questions indeed.. will be peppering her =ith questions both before and during and after the meeting.. More later. On Apr 3, 2018, at 4:16 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: i thought we agreed justin was NOT right = it is not clear that they are not folllowing =rocede it is clear that you needd to get serious and =ee where this is heading. . did you ask in =riting for anyting. we should attempt to have her send more =umb emails that is your only leverage. we would =ike to knowyour rights. ? ask ? we would like =o know the justification for their inquirres. =tc. i know there are other things going on in =our life. sorry. again these are =he crown jewels. it is clear that they are out to get =ou. contrary to your views. the suspension test the =aters as to if you are needed at orgins at all. = All of this will become part of a permante record so =ou must make some self serviing wriingns On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Lawrence Krauss =span dir="ltr" class="' =rote: Well, this came in today, and this clarifies =ome things.. Particulary it is clear that this office is not really =ollowing any procedure and isn't out to deal with me in a =ay that respects my rights. (no surprise to you!). Statements =ike "include, but not limited to"? What the fuck =s that? Also, it seems clear that from the list of =E2 allegations' (and note they don't explain which =nes they are actually investigating), that the