From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2015 4:51 PM To: Jeremy Rubin Subject: Re: New Yorker article on insider trading: very good, we have to be careful that the info is no= stolen info. , ie belongs to the co. etc. o=herwise patents etc could be traded . =br> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jeremy Rubi= > wrote: http:/=www.newyorker.com/business/currency/making-insider-trading-legal <http://www.newyorker.c=m/business/currency/making-insider-trading-legal> Of course you're probably much more up to date on such pieces than my=elf, but this seems like an interesting kernel to framework a cryptosystem=around. If the item being passed is informations which you always forward =hrough at least a few other people before unlocking the information, and t=en are able to use that information to trade well (eg, with some probabili=y p of having success based on quality of information), it operates as a p=obabilistic payment system where you can exchange out of the system by tra=ing stocks in traditional systems (so you "get" a payment some p=percent of the time). Thoughts? adiv> please =ote The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved EFTA_R1_01597729 EFTA02481342