From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:54 PM To: Brad Wechsler Subject: Re: no problem , the issue is simple, you have man= people in your office. no one is looking at the numbers received =A0 to check for the most basic of errors. fo=warding me, numbers that have not even been looked at seems a waste of eve=yones time, especially mine - not dissimilar to zero rec=iveables on art space.. I dont have the time to do the basic =eview that should have been being done. Sorry but i dont have the t=me this week to talk to rj, like my suggestion from day one, =C2 all needs to be redone, sorry, rich does not understand=how fuel cost per hour times number of hours , needs to be accurate.= leon and you told me that castrucii selling point was that he=said his fundamental view was that he needed accurate numbers or everythin= else was a waste of time. here we are On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 a= 9:44 AM, Brad Wechsler wrote:<=r> Jeffrey-some people here feel you are confusing certain items....which may =r may not be true. May I suggest you organize your questions and get on th= phone with rich j and then we can identify meaningful loose ends. Two thi=gs to remember: we don't control the form in which jet produces numbers and, I believe, most importantly yo= and I (and likely leon) agree that a simple restructure to part 91 is lik=ly the best path. In addition--and on a separate front-- we plan to scrutin=ze costs for potential savings. As you know we have not done this yet. Also, I'm a little unclear on w=at your ultimate goal is. B Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:20:34 -0500 To: Brad Wechsler Cc: Richard J Bronstein Castrucci Joslin wrote: Subject: Re: John Joe Avantario it says charter revenue only 312 but letter says apo=lo hours were 42 at 18k each hour? On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Brad Wechsler MEMORAN