From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 6:08 PM To: Svet Subject: Fwd: Forwarded messag= From: Cep =Heil 6enanoa On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Cepr =85i1 6enAKOs <=a href=" get="_blank" is it poss=ble to meet with him? 2016-01-30 17:08 GMT+03:00 Jeffrey E. <[email protected]=>: rote: For you alone ar> Forwarded message From: Vincenzo lozzo & Date: Saturday, 30 lanu Subject: To: "jef=rey E." <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» It's =ard to tell w/o proper code/documentation (couldn't find much online).=ln general the four things are: 1) the devi= is in the details, meaning that even if in theory it's all solid the =mplementation might have bugs. There's no definitive technical solutio= for that though 2) anything that is "=ustom" (eg: they have a custom wifi protocol) is a red flag because i= means that it hasn't been properly vetted and might be broken/buggy=C2 3) there aren't enough details online t= tell but it seems to me that to speed up the blockchain verification they=partially centralize the network by using their own "supernodes"=(essentially the wallets talk to the supernodes vs the actual blockchain).=The security of those servers seems key to me and they gloss over it onlin= 4) the mesh network implementation is completely=up in the air (judging from what's public) and it could go horribly wr=ng. So that needs further verification Also=(5), in general the disadvantage of distributed /open things is that it is=a lot easier to steal money vs a closed network (like swift). Are you looking to invest into this thing? If so , I'=d suggest a few things: A) because problem =1) above is not completely solvable, they need to have a plan. Part =f it is technical (do continuous code auditing, pentesting, on board prope= crypto people, etc), the other part is legal/financial EFTA_R1_01584556 EFTA02472539