From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 12:53 PM To: David Sauvage Cc: gino yu Subject: Re: I greatly appreciatei the honesty, I don= think will work with pictures. but might work face to face. if it w=11 work at all. if so I would try 10 women, and t=n names. . you with need to touch each one. ..=A0 On =un, Aug 14, 2016 at 10:32 PM, David Sauvage wrote: Earlier today, I sat down with 15 =ictures and 15 names and tried to match them. It turned out to be quite a =truggle -- primarily because people were very similar. For instance, I'=d have descriptions like this: Shy but relatively=happy on the outside Filled with frustration and anxiety Burning with rage deep down But out of the 15 p=ople, that could vaguely describe 3 or 4 them. So my matching ending up lo=king like a convoluted chart. What I conclu=ed was that I need a bit more help designing this experiment. Ideally, rat=er than matching 15 names to pictures, I have a bunch of binary decisions =A or B). One would expect me to get 50% right. IF the people are emotional=y different enough (happy v. sad, for instance) I hypothesize I will do co=siderably better than chance. Does that make sense? I have started to go down this road with my friend at NYU. Happy to disc=ss with Gino as well. And of course, happy =o submit to MRI machines and the like to figure what's happening on th=t end. Open to any and all thoughts. Science, cle=rly, is not my gift. Very best, David</=iv> On Tue,=Aug 9, 2016 at 1:49 PM, David Sauvage wrote: Hi Jeffrey, Sorry it took a beat to respond= This weekend, when I have space and time, I'll ask a friend=to lay out some pictures and names and see how I do. And I'll report b=ck what I learn. EFTA_R1_01554866 EFTA02453747