From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:45 PM To: David Sauvage Subject: Re: i told them that the astroler in the room could tell them =heir diagnosis. they all received the exact same piece o= paper , however they all rated the astrologer as between good an pe=fect On=Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:39 AM, David Sauvage ca wrote: <1=iv> On Tue, Aug 1=, 2016 at 12:30 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» =rote: you dont have to =e a scientist to underatnd the concept of proof. =C240 does massage work? not a science question , but some thi=k it does. can you prove to anyone that your intuitive a=ilities are repeatable. verifiable, . probab=y not. but is ok. with vast experience , chinese d=ctors can tell if someones kidneys are working properly, the =yes are a little dull and yellow, its not science but a pretty=good predictor. . the other experiment you can try if yo= want is hold their hands. write down what you feel. 4)=A0 , and afterwards have them choose which best describes thei= charcateristics. I did this with 200 girls. =C2. each one had to rate the accuracy of diagnosisi on a scale of 1-10.=C24k the results ranged from 3-10. 4,=A0 however, the written diagnosis was exactly the =ame for each, no one like the results . beliveing is mo=e fun On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvage =lt <mailt > wrote: I don't mind anything you're saying - I am defini=ely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don't know much about =xperiments and design. I feel like it'd=be good to talk it out? I say what I can do, and somebody who knows scienc= tells me how we can test that, until we arrive at a solution that works b=th ways? Sent from my mobile device On Aug 16, =016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: I like you, I am trying to b= kind, that is not science. . if you make people feel be=ter and no one is injured , all the best to