From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:31 PM To: David Sauvage Subject: Re: you dont have to be a scientist to underatnd the concept o= proof. does massage work? not a=science question , but some think it does. can you prove=to anyone that your intuitive abilities are repeatable. =erifiable, . probably not. but is ok. =ith vast experience , chinese doctors can tell if someones kidneys are wor=ing properly , the eyes are a little dull and yellow, Q=A0 its not science but a pretty good predictor. . the ot=er experiment you can try if you want is hold their hands. wri=e down what you feel. , and afterwards have them choose =hich best describes their charcateristics. l=did this with 200 girls. each one had to rate the accuracy of =iagnosisi on a scale of 1-10. the results ra=ged from 3-10. however, the writ=en diagnosis was exactly the same for each, no one like the re=ults . beliveing is more fun <=r> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:57 AM, David Sauvag= wrote: I don't mind anything you'r= saying - I am definitely not a scientist, don't claim to be, and don&=39;t know much about experiments and design. I feel like it'd be good to talk it out? I say what I can do, and som=body who knows science tells me how we can test that, until we arrive at a=solution that works both ways? Sent from my mobile device On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:44 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote= I like you,=C2* I am trying to be kind, that is not science. . if =ou make people feel better and no one is injured , all the best to you.40=A0 how about being blindfolded and guessing their =ame. the outcome must be verifiable, not you are s=y, , sometimes. angry other times . the trick of mentalis=s that do much better than that. they could take a strength fi=der test, and then you could take it with empathy for them, 40=A0 there are 100 questions see if you got the more than 80 per=ent right. On Tue, Aug 16,