From: Richard Kahn Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 11:52 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: FW: Great St. James Please advise Thank=you From: </=pan> Ryan Wisehart <rwisehart=visurveyors.com <mailto:[email protected]» Date: Thu=sday, March 31, 2016 at 4:10 PM To: Erika Kellerhals Cc: Richard K=h =gt; Subject: Re: Great St. James<=r> Good afternoon Erika, <=iv>Please let me know how to proceed with respect to my last e-mail. Is the=e any owner feed back on the plan? Should we proceed with permitting plan p=eparation? etc. Sincerely, =yan C. Wisehart, PLS President =RIAN MOSELEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4003 Raphune Hill Road Suite #606 &n=s ;St. Thomas, VI 00802 ph. 340.774.5310 ext. 104 - fx. 340.=76.4090 cl. 340.998.5366 - skype: On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:43 P=, Ryan Wisehart wrote: Erika, <mailto For yo=r convenience I'm attaching the original proposal and budget documents prov=ded to Daphne, then forwarded by her to Rich. The following narrative shoul= help fill-in the gaps which I probably didn't communicated well via the pr=posal. Our Scope-of-Work as conceived includes Road=Design and Development and Topographic Surveying, as follows: 1. (Delivered). The purpose of th=s exercise is to determine feasible and preferable routes for accessing the=island promontories. The owner desires gentler routes than those developed =n Little St. James. With that in mind we used existing aerial terrain mappi=g to develop routes that should have gradients of about 10% or less. Routes=were also determined that will facilitate future water and helicopter point= of access. At this point I need the owner's feedback before proceeding =o a more detailed engineering plan. Does the owner want more or fewer r=ads, access to other locations, etc? We'll incorporate owner feedback into = revised concept and proceed to developing permit plans. EFTA_R1_01444787 EFTA02404830