From: David Sauvage Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:59 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: I'd need some help with this... especially if it requi=es interacting with 20 people in a row. Am open to whatever. But can't=manage it all on my own. Also I had another idea of how=to still use photos, make it objective and verifiable, and control for the=problem of people being too similar. Something like the below... Jon is my=friend at NYU. What's your guess. In your hea=t of hearts, am I for real or am I delusional? D<=div> Study design id=a #1 Jon gives David 50 pictures without names. David classifies based on their emotions. People who have clear emotions that &quo=;come through" are then put into the experiment People who don't are discarded. Let's say there are 20 pictures left. David classifies them into HAPPY CLUSTER or SAD CLUSTER</=iv> Jon divides the pictures into ten group= of two, so each group of two pictures has one HAPPY and one SAD Jon then reads/shows David one name per group t=at fits either the happy guy or the sad guy David matches A or B Chance put= me at 50% I predict I'll g=t it right 95% If we do this 10 times= I believe I will get 9 or 10 right per cycle We can do lots of cycles =div> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:54 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]=> wrote: 4 you said she had brown eyes, it wouldnt appy to just anyone.=C2 you said she was girlie, the dress was a girlie dress. =C2 you said she was rigid, astrolger language. = there were many photos of people in the room, i chose not to =sk you to pick names given in random order. have y=ur subjects write their own desci[tions of themselves . =C2 shy - 1- 10. rigid 1-10. curious 1-10. =C2 then choose who wrote which one. =C2 try 20 people. On=Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:48 AM, David Sauvage <a wrote: Question for you: when I read your lad=-friend in the room, did you feel I was tapping into something real? Or di= you feel I was just saying random stuff that would apply