From: Brad Edwards Sent: Friday, Septe To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Again....with the fees and costs that I owe that offer is not even clo=e to enticing. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 25, 2015, at 7:44 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com> wrote: we both agreed i am the underdog in the 4th, as they will =e in conflict with themselves. . so if you now say no sc. = then , I would propose you pay me 100k if i win and I pay you a million i= i lose. - dersh is my time, no financial risk to me. still i would like to get it settled or delayed , = , cvra , is not the ethical as much as the pr. and judge reaction.&=bsp; i appreciate you taking the time to try to work it out.. = On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Brad Edwards wrote: (1) I don't control that call completely. Everyone on my side ha= wanted the depos since January and they are finally happening. (2) =hat case either settles or it doesn't. There is nothing complicated about =t. There is nothing that needs more time. I'm being more than reasonable in the offer to settle that case. I d= not want that case to turn into our case - where it goes on for years. We=take these depos, add punitives, then get a trial. And it ends. Once and f=r all. If it is the other case that is driving the delay, I don't understand =hat. Clearly one case has nothing to do with the other. And really, consid=ring the facts of that case I could not be more reasonable than I am being=there also. I feel like on one hand you say you want a global settlement. That is fine with me so w= have tried to work toward that end. But the reality is that you want me t= agree to some unreasonable deal. If we think about the cases, and what was alleged, I'm crazy to be con=idering the numbers we are talking about. Juries will render multi-million=dollar verdicts for me and I believe over $20m. I know you say my reputati=n has not been harmed. But that's not true. I've done good work to overcome and mitiga