From: Barry J. Cohen < Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 2:56 AM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: [External] Fwd: Plane > We are factoring this into our structure recommendations. Lots of constra=nts. Apollo doesn't want to be an owner or an operator. Makes 91 operation= for Apollo tricky. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 18, 2017, at 8:23 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]» wrote: ex Forwarded messa e From: Melanie Spinella Date: Thu, May 21, 2015 a : Subject: Plane To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]<mailto:jeevacation@gmailcom» Jeffrey — Leon asked me to ask you. Debra is going to Chicago May 30th =96 back and forth the same day. Here is the response from Jet Hi Melanie, For May 30th with the 12pm departure out of Teterboro and 11pm departure ou= of Chicago the duty day is at 15hrs18min. For 135 trips crew cannot excee= 14hr duty day. If you wish to operate this flight as 135 we must do a cre= swap in Chicago. If we were to operate this fight as 91 with a Chief Pilo= approval we could extended the duty day to 16hrs. Please let me know how =ou wish to proceed. Can we switch to 91— Here is what they said about the difference: When operation 91 the owner has operation control and we have a little bit =f flexibility with extending the duty day as long the chief pilot approves=it. When operation 135 its consider business and the rules are a lot stricter. =e are not able to extend the duty day. Two pilots can only be on duty up t= 14hrs and no more than 10hrs of flight time. Thank you! Melanie Spinella I Apollo Management 9West 57th Street. New York. New York 10019 • Executive Assistant to Leon D. Black This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended =olely for the person or entity to whom they are addressed and may contain =onfidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissem=nation or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this info=mation by