From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 2:58 AM To: Barry J. Cohen Subject: Re: [External] Plane Apollo? > On Aug 18, 2017, at 10:56 PM, Barry J. Cohen rote: > We are factoring this into our structure recommendations. Lots of =onstraints. Apollo doesn't want to be an owner or an operator. Makes 91 =perations for Apollo tricky. > Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 18, 2017, at 8:23 PM, jeffrey E. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]» wrote: > ex • Forwarded message > From: Melanie Spinella >= > Da e: u, ay , a : > Subject: Plane > To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]» > Jeffrey — Leon asked me to ask you. Debra is going to Chicago =ay > 30th — back and forth the same day. Here is the response =rom Jet > Hi Melanie, > For May 30th with the 12pm departure out of Teterboro and 1 1pm =eparture out of Chicago the duty day is at 15hrs18min. For 135 trips =rew cannot exceed 14hr duty day. If you wish to operate this flight as =35 we must do a crew swap in Chicago. If we were to operate this fight =s 91 with a Chief Pilot approval we could extended the duty day to =6hrs. Please let me know how you wish to proceed. > Can we switch to 91— Here is what they said about the =ifference: > When operation 91 the owner has operation control and we have a little =it of flexibility with extending the duty day as long the chief pilot =pproves it. > When operation 135 its consider business and the rules are a lot =tricter. We are not able to extend the duty day. Two pilots can only be =n duty up to 14hrs and no more than 10hrs of flight time. > Thank you! > Melanie Spinella I Apollo Management > 9West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019 • > •:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Executive Assistant to Leon D. Black EFTA_R1_01330186 EFTA02351668