From: Lawrence Krauss Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:12 AM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: noam.. detailed travel info we need to talk.. about to get on the plane. On =an 26, 2015, at 6:04 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: but why can;t we interpret the data that says makes the =entral limit theorum , look like gravity, a bell =urve could look like the points being drawn towards the =ean. no force. ? but it appears as one On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Lawrence Krauss =span dir="ltr" class=""a < > wrote: quick response now before I go =o bed.. more later when we talk in US... the key is symmetry.. mathematical =ymmetries exist in the case of gravity that don't exist in the =ther cases that preserve the 1/02 form.. On Jan =9, 2015, at 2:52 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: krauss , I have been =eseraching the various power laws. zipf pareto. and various =istributions. . i have some financail insights on the =ubject.. however the more i play in the field , and =ind what could be described as an adjunct to the central limit theorum. = there is no" force" that pushes these events into a power law =istribution. why is gravity different. why is =t not no more than a power law distribuition = On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:56 PM, =awrence Krauss < rote: Hi =effrey: Here is an email thread of conversation with Noam, who =ust emailed me.. Can we give him specifics? FYI, nancy and I will =Iy down on March 21st I think (I might come a day earlier) and stay =vernight with you, and I figure we can all fly up the next morning for =he evening event.. and then you guys will fly to boston on the 23rd.. =nbsp;sound good? Begin forwarded message: Subject: Re: only march 22nd =ow available 1 EFTA_R1_01323066 EFTA02348768