From: Robert Kuhn Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 3:54 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Kuhn Remember, agree; the data (which attracts =ublic interest) induces underlying mathematical structure? On =un 11, 2017, at 11:13 AM, jeffrey E. •[email protected]> wrote: i know Geoffrey well., maybe = its a description of data though rather than a =erivation On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 9:03 AM, =obert Kuhn wrote: I think we discussed Geoffrey West on the =E2*.hidden mathematical patterns' underlying seemingly =nrelated stuff - to me, part of 'general systems theory'.=Geoffrey is a CTT contributor, though minimally so, and I've =anted to do more. I was reminded by a recent review in The Economist = http://www.economist.com/news/books- and-arts/21721895-non-linear-scaling-explains-everything-productivity-cities-safe-dosage (and attached). I think his work fits =pisode 2 (and/or 1) On Jun 10, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Robert Kuh Revised - Version 2 Page 1 - Added to overall =escription: wrote: .... Suffused throughout =re meta-issues in philosophy of science, including the nature of inquiry and explanation, =xperimental design, probabilities, reproducibility and kinds of =onfidence. Page 2: 1: modified 11 and 13 added. Evolutionary Models and Integrated Information Theory are =ut but held as Alternatives - although both are important and have been =onsidered 'breakthroughs' in the past, both are well =overed in other media. We'd want this series to focus on =uture breakthroughs, those just over the horizon. EFTA_R1_01322328 EFTA02348369