From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Friday, July 8, 201612:02 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Who did she lie to? Congress? &n=sp;l don't think she did. The investigation concluded that she didn't=intend to mishandle classified info, so her statements to congress were con=istent with her state of mind. Just because the FBI found things that=were inconsistent with what she said doesn't mean she lied -- only means th=t she was mistaken. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 8= 2016, at 7:28 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: =div> i understood that , however what she told the fbi was t=e truth , and she lied under oath, can her vo=ntary testimony to the fbi with no transcripts or sworn staetments be=nbsp; used as conclusive evidence of perjury. where a contradic=ory sworn statment would be easier <mailto On Thu Jul 7 2016 at 10:45 PM, Kathy Ruem=ler > wrote: He was correct. It is not under o=th. It is subject to felony prosecution for making a false statement u=der 18 USC 1001, which is more significant than being under oath. Se=t from my iPad On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:42 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]=m <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: yup. . comey testimony was solid except for=the revelation that she did not testify under oath. ? ,&n=sp; whoops. <mailt On Thu Jul 7 2016 at 7:51 PM, Kathy Ruemmler > wrote: He may have Jeffrey-style megalomaniac tendencies. Sen= from my iPhone EFTA_R1_01316741 EFTA02346023