home

epstein-data
Research ▼
🔍 SearchFull-text document search 🤖 Ask AIAI research assistant 🔎 Evidence MapFBI serial resolution 📷 Reverse Image SearchCLIP + face across 614K images 🧑 Find Face BETASearch 29K faces by photo 💻 Run Your OwnDownload & search locally
Explore ▼
📚 Full Text Corpus1.39M docs, 2.77M pages 🌎 Global Heatmap145 countries mentioned 📈 Coverage MapWhat's here 🌌 AtlasSemantic map · 1.29M docs ⚖ Cases53 federal & state cases · per-case briefings 🎤 DepositionsTranscribed audio & video 💬 Hear from the SurvivorsSurvivors in their own words 📖 Cover to Cover-Up24-hour public reading, synced to the video ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails2,009 messages · 2009–2019
📷 Images92K analyzed photographs 🔍 Multi-DB SearchSearch all databases individually 🗃 All Databases14 searchable databases
Reports
News ▼
📰 NewsCoverage & reporting ⚖ Justice MonitorArrests, charges, lawsuits, firings
Source ▼
🏛 DOJ ProductionOfficial EFTA disclosures 📜 EFTA Law TextPublic Law 119-38 📁 Source Data (GitHub)Open source databases
🌐 Community ResourcesCurated external projects ✉ ContactGeneral · privacy · DMCA · press
❤️ Donate 🎧 Podcast

Research

🔍 Search Documents 🤖 Ask AI 🔎 Evidence Map 📷 Reverse Image Search 🧑 Find Face BETA 💻 Run Your Own Investigator

Explore

📚 Full Text Corpus 🌎 Global Heatmap 📈 Coverage Map 🌌 Atlas ⚖ Cases 🎤 Depositions 💬 Hear from the Survivors 📖 Cover to Cover-Up ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails 📷 Images 🔍 Multi-DB Search 🗃 All Databases

Reports

Browse All Reports 📰 News ⚖ Justice Monitor

Source

🏛 DOJ Production 📜 EFTA Law 📁 Source Data (GitHub) 🌐 Community Resources ✉ Contact
🎧 Podcast & Newsletter ❤️ Donate Privacy Policy

EFTA02342838

← Prev Next →
Loading document…

From: Joi Ito <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:47 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Google/EU Attachments: signature.asc I'm sure you saw the news about Google in the EU, but if you haven't, an =xcerpt. » Today the EU's highest court interpreted the EU's 1995 Data » =rotection Directive to mean that individuals should have a shot at » insisting =hat Google and other search engines remove certain search » results found =pon a search for their names, not because they are » false, or infringe =opyright, but because they violate a "respect for » private life" or a "right=to protection of personal data." What does » that mean specifically? =ot easy to say. Neither the opinion nor the Court's press release is clear =n that. » Among the many cases pending about it, the one that the Court heard » =nvolved a Spanish citizen who did not like that people could find » the public =ecords of a foreclosure sale of one of his properties. » So that's not =ersonal, secret information that was somehow » uncovered; it's a public record =r fact made more searchable. And » it's not in the narrow category of things =ike social security » numbers that might be in public documents, but for =hich Google and » other search engines have taken some steps to make them =ot work as » search terms. (Same with credit card numbers.) 1 EFTA_R1_01310294 EFTA02342838

Suggest a category
Misclassified? Pick a better fit.
Community Notes
▸ People Mentioned
▸ Interest Level
Routine Notable Significant
▸ Dates Mentioned
▸ Related Topics
▸ Places & Organizations
▸ Transcription Correction
Related documents
Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee

You are leaving epstein-data.com

You are being redirected to an external website not operated by this project. We are not responsible for the content or privacy practices of external sites.

Powered by Datasette