To: Steven Sinofsky From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wed 4/3/2013 9:51:59 PM Subject: Re: removing means only talking to me and not to jay, so that i can filter and highlight, On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Steven Sinofsky wrote: of course this is all good. there's no blame to go around. couple of thoughts: • not sure what me "removing myself" does but up to you • my view is that they offered a "random $5m" and I came back with make me whole for leaving and not asking to rest and vest ("the andy lees treatment" as lisa Brummel/HR calls it►. Brad will say this is a cost to me of being removed because was toxic. So is andy. But $10 seems like a random number halfway between a logical number and another random number ($5). • I would prefer not to name Samsung as instead say "Aside from this list of companies, Steven and other former Microsoft employees can join any organization without litigation". I want to push on other people and not have them name Samsung or any other company (box.net for example) a no fly zone *because* of me. • I don't want to be reciprocal in unenforceable things like non-disparagement. I want all of that to be one sided. the goal is to make this as petty as possible. • I have been beyond reproach. It is my style. I just don't do stuff like that about competitors or just people I don't like. Ovitz says hi. We had lunch. Sent from Surface RT Check out http://blog.learningbyshipping.com From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 1:17 PM To: Steven Sinofsky Brad is really at 10. being gracious and above reproach in this negotiation will go a long way to stopping steve from trashing you. you are right about the pr and i am very sensitve to it. I will handle it moving foward with jay, you can always blame jay , we will tell brad that you have removed yourself. I will charge you a one million dollar fee ( i will not get insulted if you choose not to ). Right at the end, not for jay , I will attempt to specifil