To: Jeffrey EpsteinUeevacation@gmaitcom] Fran: Lola M Sent Sat 9/8/2012 5:27:17 PM Subject RE: I am trying to understand. 1 always questioned the assumptions in order to be corrected by right anwers. Just saying that it is wrong, how can I learn from that? (Btw I wrote candy is out of sugar and not that it is sugar.) So, would you please give me the right answers if you know? Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 13:06:50 -0400 Subject: Re: From: [email protected] To: it is always easy to come to erroneious conclusions when your definitions are fraught with errors. bliss is not complete happiness. where did you find that bourgoiuis definiton.. candy is not sugar. , you are trying too hard to be right, and slipping on a banana peel of the common On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Lola M wrote: I took some time to overthink your messages: So first you say your best student achieved bliss which is by definition complete happiness, isn't it? Then you say something that makes one happy - happiness - is cheap like sweet candy and not good enough as it does not get one thinking, don't you? But then you state that everything is like candy, which by definition is out of sugar, which is sweet, even if there exist different variations of candy. So the achievement of your best student is also like candy - isn't it? - which is not good enough and therefore not really an achievement, or is it? So what gets one thinking if everything is like candy? Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 07:07:42 -0400 Subject: Re: From: iccvacationqiumail com To: You are having way too much candy. You want more and more as you get bored by the taste easier and faster, it is a vicious circle. this is not a question , it is a conclusion. and a waste of your time a On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:05 AM, 'swam wrote: I am being a student. EFTA_R1_00306854 EFTA01888699