To: Dr. Henry Jareck From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Tue 4/21/2009 5:00:18 PM Subject: Re: no.. i beliebe that history would prove„( i am aware that there arc exceptions ).. that true breakthroughs , revelations. advances„ are NOT likely if not nearly impossible to come from those that arc not exceptional. the advances in disease prevention, technolgy, were no found in a paper from somalia on the efect of oysters, on the carbon footprint. the small pieces of advance arc true, but stringing them together for a meaningful outcome is much more unlikely than from a person already at the top of his field .. The book review, that i oulined is an example fo the butterfly wing in mexico causing the tsunami.. makes intersting cocktail conversation . On Tuc, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Dr. Henry Jarecki wrote: Since I am fond of you, I will not comment in an ad hominem way. You believe (erroneously) that scientific knowledge happens in giant bites and high significance and is identifiable from a distance. I believe it happens in small pieces, a bit at a time. I am as we speak, in a scientific advisory board meeting where the bites they are discussing are far smaller than the effect of storage on mackerel, a matter of urgency to farmers, grocers, housewives, economists, all of whom will use it for their benefit and some of whom will use it as further stepping stones to more ideas and studies. From: Jeffrey Epstein [mailto:ieevacationOomail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 09 12:20 To: Dr. Henry Jarecki Subject: I guess you did n;t read what was sent.. An example of the world class ( not merely chatty dinner companions ) work. thousands upon thousands of this quality work can be found on the web evcrday... THis looks worse than the earmarks for Leahys district .1 THe effect of EFTA_R1_00202696 EFTA01827530