From: jeffrey epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 6:15 PM To: Nadia Subject: Re: labels 1 if I had programmed your=values you would be far ahead of where you are. In fact I failed to reprogr=m them . 2 it was not passive aggressive it was only aggressive , 3 your fo=us and understanding of consequences has not changed ,and I only want good t=ings for you and Believe you would be better in another city.i have been co=sistent on that fact but like the vast majority of things , i believe=i fully expect you will ignore my best advice .. 4 I have no intenti=n of sharing your excretions. <=r>Sent from my i Pad On Apr 21, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Nadi wrote: <=r> Well, that was unnecessarily harsh.. 1. It is a fact that the time I spent with you will=make my future dating difficult, but that is mostly a result of you exposing me to your unusual lifestyle and reprogramming all my values, priorities and sense of right and wrong, when you started dating me as a teenager. I was a willing participant, so don't think I am blaming you for it or using it as a= excuse. I'm just stating a fact. Because of you I ha=e come to not only tolerate, but genuinely prefer and seek a lifestyle that includes other girls and an 'open•=804 relationship... If you call that selfish, jealous or small-minded, I don't know what=to say. It's true this may be difficult to find but it is for the opposite r=asons than those you listed. 2. Love is a now a label? You had no problem Q=98labeling' your relationships since I met you. Your sudden artificial refusal to have an adu=t conversation and use common English words because you don't want to Q=80•put labels' on things, supports your stubbornness more than your open-mi=ded and unconventional views about relationships. Why would you make a passive-aggressive comment lik= "Glad to s=e your reaction is not based on my being happy or not", and then refuse to answer the q=estion. I have no idea if you are happ