From: Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:48 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: okay. i will let lesley know to sched me in for a call tomorrow. =br> On Mon, Dec 20, =010 at 12:28 PM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: I know very little about mike, „ you can s=ay with your friend on the 7th, we can conference at any time tomorrow. On Mon, Dec=20, 2010 at 12:23 PM, = wrote: oops didn't see thi= before - sorry for delay in response: have had a hectic we=k trying to find a place to live, so wasn't checki=g in real time. so i got a name / intro from a friend last week for an SEO=guy. i was going to reach out to him but i wanted to talk to you fir=t about how to frame the project...( we just didn't get a chance to di=cuss when i saw you last.) can we have phone convo about how i should proceed with=him? or would you like to contact him directly? again... this is a referral...i can dig deeper into more people and i =hink having a game plan would be a good idea. (I am in the middle of fl=shing out a bunch of other thoughts to you regarding the interviews whi=h I will send you later today which may help on this google front). also, i have a feeling that in this case, Mike (i thi=k that was his name) was a pretty good person to lead the tech side (Al ma=e him out to seem like a pretty big player and that the reason things went=south was b/c of a kind of perfect storm of a computer/payment problem tha= coincided with a Google sweep). But of course, you spoke to the guy =A0and have much longer history with (and more info about) all these cat=. What was your instinct about Mike (if you can separate that from your=current Al outlook). And, if you think Mike was good, is that relations=ip still in tact at all or is it easier to just start tabula rasa? finally: what is happening w the conference on the isla=d? is that something that you think i really should be at and if so wha= are the dates or who should i c